The Hurd Family Partnership, L.P. v. The Farmers Bank et al
| The Hurd Family Partnership, L.P. |
| The Farmers Bank, Freedom Holding, Inc., W. Bennett Collett and W. Bennett Collett, JR. |
| 3:2013cv00485 |
| May 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Breckinridge |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 12/19/2016 - The plaintiff's motion to alter judgment or vacate 87 is DENIED. The plaintiff's motion to substitute a party 90 is GRANTED. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay to conduct a status conference. cc: Counsel(DAK)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 3/9/2016 - Defendant Farmers Bank's motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff The Hurd Family Partnership (D.N. 59) is GRANTED and the Partnership's claims against Farmers are DISMI SSED WITH PREJUDICE. Farmers' motion for summary judgment on its cross-claim against Freedom Holding and W. Bennett Collett (D.N. 60) is GRANTED. Freedom and W. Bennett Collett are liable for the promissory note and commercial guaranty agreement executed in 2012. cc: Counsel(DAK) Modified on 3/10/2016-edited date (DAK).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
