Milby v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
| Samatha Milby |
| Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
| Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
| Samatha Milby |
| 3:2013cv00487 |
| May 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/11/2016, re 74 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. The Court will enter an order in accordance with this Opinion.cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 8/31/2016. For the reasons set forth, Defendant's 61 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED, and Plaintiff's 67 Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Parties shall PROCEED WITH DISCOVERY. Parties to file a Joint Proposed Amended Scheduling Order by 9/23/2016. cc: Counsel(RLK)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/30/15: The Court will DENY Plaintiff's motion to remand DN 8 and her motion for a hearing and oral argument DN 43 , and it will GRANT Liberty's motion for leave to file a surreply DN 39 . A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion. cc:counsel (DJT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
