Perez v. Off Duty Police Services, Inc. et al
Thomas E. Perez |
Off Duty Police Services, Inc., Darrell Spurgeon and Bonnie Spurgeon |
3:2013cv00935 |
September 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Jefferson |
Thomas B. Russell |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 6/30/2017 - The defendants' motion to alter, correct, or vacate the judgment, or alternatively to hold a hearing on the judgment (D.N. 71) is DENIED. The defendants' objection to the bill of costs (D.N. 69) is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part. The Court will remove $2,152.15 from the Bill of Costs. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to tax costs against the defendants in the amount of $10,728.00. cc: Counsel(DAK) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 7/2/2015 - Because there are genuine disputes of fact and reasonable inferences from which a jury could find that the ODPS workers were independent contractors, DOL is not entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (DN 18) is DENIED. cc: Counsel (DAK) |
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 5/4/2015 - The Court denies Defendants Motion to Compel Urgent Services LLCs Compliance with Defendants' Subpoena 21 and grants Urgent Services, LLCs Motion to Quash 26 . cc: Counsel(DAK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.