Little et al v. Louisville Gas and Electric Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 13, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 4/12/2017: Having weighed the factors of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. All remaining state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice so that they may be filed in state court. cc: counsel (JBM)
|February 14, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 2/13/2017 granting 93 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: The Plaintiffs' claim for operating without a valid Title V permit is DISMISSED, and Defendant PPL is DISMISSED from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file briefs addressing whether the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims in accordance with the above briefing schedule. Simultaneous Briefs due by 3/6/2017. Responsive briefs due by 3/21/2017. cc: Counsel (JBM)
|July 17, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 7/16/14: Remaining in this action are the Plaintiffs state-law claims, as well as their CAA claims related to the alleged operation of Cane Run without a valid permit. cc: Counsel (DJT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?