Scheffler v. Lee et al
Plaintiff: Troy K. Scheffler
Defendant: Alex Lee, Michael Carroll, Frederick Asset Protection LLC, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government and City of Louisville
Case Number: 3:2014cv00373
Filed: May 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 200 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 5/4/2020. Plaintiffs' motion for payment of attorney's fees and costs, DN 197 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with this opinion. cc: Counsel (ALS)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 180 Jury Instructions. (KD)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 159 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 7/9/2019. The Court : GRANTS Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Richard Rosenthal (DN 125 ). GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant' s Motion in Limine (DN 126 ) as described herein. GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Post-Arrest Evidence and Evidence of Plaintiff's Status as a Party to Unrelated Civil and Criminal Cases (DN 128 ) as described herein. GRANTS the Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (DN 134 ). cc: Counsel (MEJ)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 1/2/2019. The Court of Appeals did not include a provision regarding costs in its opinion. Further, the mandate regarding that opinion, issued on 10/29/2018, states "COSTS: none." DN 115 at 2. Since the Sixth Circuit has declined to order costs associated with the filing fee, this Court is precluded from doing so. Therefore, the motion to tax costs (DN 114 ) is DENIED.cc:counsel (RLJ)
December 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 106 MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 12/14/2017, re Defendants Alex Lee and Michael Carroll's 92 MOTION for Summary Judgment cc: Counsel (RLK)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/7/2016, re 51 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government. A separate Order will be entered.cc: Counsel (RLK)
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/3/2015 - As we find palpable error in our earlier ruling, we will grant Sheffler's motion to alter or amend the judgment (DN 55) and vacate our earlier Memorandum Opinion and Order (DN 50). A separate order will be entered herein this date in accordance with this opinion. cc: Counsel (DAK)
August 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/21/2015 - Defendant Frederick Asset Protection LLC's motion to dismiss (DN 39) is GRANTED. Frederick Asset Protection LLC is DISMISSED as a defendant. Plaintiff Troy Scheffler's motion for leave to file sur-reply (DN 46) is DENIED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel(DAK)
November 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge John G. Heyburn, on initial review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) IT IS ORDERED that the City of Louisville is DISMISSED as a Defendant. Certain federal and state law claims will be allowed to continue. See Memo for specifics -cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Jefferson County Atty (SG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scheffler v. Lee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Troy K. Scheffler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frederick Asset Protection LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Louisville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?