Davis v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
| Richard E. Davis |
| Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company |
| 3:2014cv00507 |
| July 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 11/18/22: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Davis's objections to Hartford Lifes Bill of Costs, [R. 146 ], are OVERRULED. Defendant Hartford Life is AWARDED costs in the amount of $1,644.25. cc: Counsel (DJT)
|
|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 8/26/2019 - Plaintiff Richard E. Davis's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 113 ] is DENIED. Defendant Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 115 ] is GRANTED. The Defendant's decision regarding Plaintiff Richard E. Davis's claim for long-term disability benefits will be AFFIRMED by separate judgment entered this date. cc: Counsel of Record (KD)
|
|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 8/12/2019 denying 119 Motion to Strike Declarations of Adam Garcia and Gail Gross. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 10/16/2018 - 106 Motion for Leave to File Response is GRANTED. The Response [R. 107 and R. 108] is DEEMED timely filed. Plaintiff's Objection [R. 104] is OVERRULED. Within fourteen (14) days. the parties SHALL file a joint report. cc: Counsel(DAK)
|
|
Filing
103
OPINION & ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 1/9/2018 granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion to Compel. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/13/2016. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting 37 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/19/2016. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Compel. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/24/2015. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard E. Davis | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Grabhorn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Caroline H. Gentry |
| Represented By: | Carolyn A. Taggart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
