Truesdell et al v. Link Snacks, Inc.
| Patricia Ann Truesdell, Darvin A. Heider, Richard Lynn Bailey and Michael D. Sergeant |
| Link Snacks, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv00551 |
| August 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/7/2016, DENYING 36 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. cc: Counsel(RLK)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 16 Motion to Certify Class; denying 24 Motion for Leave to file Surreply. Within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order, the parties shall meet and confer in an attempt to agree upon the proposed notice and consent form. The proposed notice and consent form shall be filed within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this Order. If the parties are unable to reach agreement on the form of the notice or consent, they must file a joint status report with the Court no later than the expiration of the forty-five (45) day deadline. Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 9/22/2015. cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 15 Motion to Transfer Venue. Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 9/16/2015. cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
