Payne v. Louisville Metro Dept of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Tyrone Richard Payne
Defendant: Louisville Metro Corrections Department, Mark Bolton, D Puckett, Lucus and Harmon
Case Number: 3:2014cv00600
Filed: September 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 94 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 9/16/2016: Defendants' motion for summary judgment 62 is GRANTED. By separate Judgment, the Court will dismiss this action. cc: counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 9/14/2016: Defendants Hopkins and Lucas's motion for summary judgment 61 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Hopkins and Lucas as parties to this action. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 56 motion to file a supplemental complaint; denying 55 motion for extension of time; denying 73 motion to dismiss state-court assault charge. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff forms for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and § 2254. Signed by Judge David J. Hale. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of record (ERH)
June 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for Cline and Puckett shall clarify within 30 days whether he also represents Green. To the extent that counsel does not represent Green or does not consent to a waiver of servic e on Green's behalf, IT IS ORDERED that either counsel for Cline and Puckett or the Jefferson County Attorney's Office must provide the Court with Green's last known address within 30 days. If an address is provided, the Clerk is DIRECTED to issue summons and have the United States Marshal serve process on Green as directed in order. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of record; Jefferson County Attorney (ERH)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. The Court CONSTRUES Plaintiff's motion (DN 12) as a motion to amend the complaint and GRANTS the motion in part. Upon initial screening, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims against LMDC, his official-capacity claims against Defendants Bolton, Puckett, Lucas, and Harmon, and his individual-capacity claims concerning stolen commissary items and verbal abuse and threats are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for f ailure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with respect to his claims concerning medical treatm ent, placement in an unsanitary cell, and placement in an open-wing dorm without a bottom bunk. Plaintiff shall name as Defendants the individuals whom he alleges are responsible for his injuries with respect to these claims and state specifically th e factual allegations against them. Should Plaintiff file no amended complaint within 30 days, the Court will enter an Order dismissing those claims. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order directing service on Defendant Puckett and governing the claim that has ben permitted to proceed. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Jefferson County Attorney (ERH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Louisville Metro Dept of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Richard Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisville Metro Corrections Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Bolton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Puckett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lucus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?