Payne v. Louisville Metro Dept of Corrections et al
| Tyrone Richard Payne |
| Louisville Metro Corrections Department, Mark Bolton, D Puckett, Lucus and Harmon |
| 3:2014cv00600 |
| September 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 9/16/2016: Defendants' motion for summary judgment 62 is GRANTED. By separate Judgment, the Court will dismiss this action. cc: counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 9/14/2016: Defendants Hopkins and Lucas's motion for summary judgment 61 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Hopkins and Lucas as parties to this action. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 56 motion to file a supplemental complaint; denying 55 motion for extension of time; denying 73 motion to dismiss state-court assault charge. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff forms for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and § 2254. Signed by Judge David J. Hale. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of record (ERH)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for Cline and Puckett shall clarify within 30 days whether he also represents Green. To the extent that counsel does not represent Green or does not consent to a waiver of servic e on Green's behalf, IT IS ORDERED that either counsel for Cline and Puckett or the Jefferson County Attorney's Office must provide the Court with Green's last known address within 30 days. If an address is provided, the Clerk is DIRECTED to issue summons and have the United States Marshal serve process on Green as directed in order. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of record; Jefferson County Attorney (ERH)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. The Court CONSTRUES Plaintiff's motion (DN 12) as a motion to amend the complaint and GRANTS the motion in part. Upon initial screening, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims against LMDC, his official-capacity claims against Defendants Bolton, Puckett, Lucas, and Harmon, and his individual-capacity claims concerning stolen commissary items and verbal abuse and threats are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for f ailure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with respect to his claims concerning medical treatm ent, placement in an unsanitary cell, and placement in an open-wing dorm without a bottom bunk. Plaintiff shall name as Defendants the individuals whom he alleges are responsible for his injuries with respect to these claims and state specifically th e factual allegations against them. Should Plaintiff file no amended complaint within 30 days, the Court will enter an Order dismissing those claims. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order directing service on Defendant Puckett and governing the claim that has ben permitted to proceed. cc:Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Jefferson County Attorney (ERH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
