Handmaker et al v. CertusBank, N.A.
Jonathan E. Handmaker and George M. Vredeveld, Jr. |
CertusBank, N.A. |
CertusBank, N.A. |
Jonathan E. Handmaker and George M. Vredeveld, Jr. |
3:2015cv00129 |
February 6, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Jefferson |
John G. Heyburn |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/27/2016 denying 118 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 124 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. cc: Counsel(KJA) |
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 94 Motion for Prejudgment Attachment. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 5/24/2016. cc: Counsel(KJA) |
Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting 49 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer and Counterclaim; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/15/2015. cc: Counsel(KJA) |
Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/9/15: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs may respond to Defendant's argumentsconcerning the wrongful termination claim by 6/16/2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may reply to Plaintiffs response concerning the wrongful termination claim by 6/23/2015. Telephonic Conference reset for 7/22/2015 at 1:00 PM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. cc:counsel (DJT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.