Reed v. Gulf Coast Enterprises et al
| Robert Ray Reed |
| Gulf Coast Enterprises, The Ginn Group, Inc., SourceAmerica, Inc. and Gary Matthews |
| 3:2015cv00295 |
| April 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Hardin |
| Colin H. Lindsay |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 4/24/2018 granting in part and denying in part 62 and 63 Motions for Summary Judgment. cc: Counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 10/26/2017 denying 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion 21 to Alter, Amend, or Vacate is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion 24 for Leave to File Amended Complaint is DENIED; Defendant SourceAmerica's Motion 23 to Certify Order as Final and Appealable Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 7/21/2016. cc: Counsel (JBM)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant SourceAmerica's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 1/6/2016. cc: Counsel(JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
