Macy et al v. GC Services Limited Partnership
| Wilbur Macy and Pamela J. Stowe |
| GC Services Limited Partnership |
| 3:2015cv00819 |
| November 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| David J. Hale |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 12/6/2019 - Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (D.N. 74 ) is GRANTED. Final Approval Hearing set for 4/10/2020 at 2:00 p.m. before Judg e David J. Hale. If the Agreement and/or this Order is voided, then the Agreement will be of no force and effect, and the Parties' rights and defenses will be restored, without prejudice, to their respective positions as if the Agreement ha d never been executed and this Order never entered. The Court retains jurisdiction over the action to consider all further matters arising out of or connected with the settlement, including the administration and enforcement of the Agreement. Please see Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. (KD)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel (DN 22 ) is granted. Case shall be maintained as a class action on behalf of class of plaintiffs as set forth . Wilbur Macy and Pamela J. Stowe are designated as class representatives, and the law firm of Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC is appointed as class counsel. Plaintiffs to submit proposed notice notifying class within 30 days. GC Services to file any objection within 15 days thereafter. Within 60 days following approval, class counsel to mail notice to class members as set forth. cc: Counsel(JAC)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (DN 23 ) is denied. Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (DN 12 ) is denied. Motion to declare offer of judgment ineffective (DN 14 ) is granted. cc: Counsel(JAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
