Hopkins v. Speedway SuperAmerica LLC et al
Shawn Hopkins |
Speedway SuperAmerica LLC, Speedway LLC and MPC Investment, LLC |
3:2015cv00834 |
November 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Jefferson |
David J. Hale |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 8/1/2017 - Speedway's motion for summary judgment (D.N. 21) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Hopkins's claim for injuries to his shoulder. The motion is DENIED as to Hopkins's claim for burn injuries to his hand. cc: Counsel(DAK) |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 5/1/2017. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the joint motion to amend the scheduling order (DN 20 ). The Court GRANTS the joint motion in part as follows: All pr eviously scheduled deadlines remain in effect unless the Court grants relief. The Court DENIES the joint motion in part as follows: The Court DENIES the parties' request for a trial date and for entry of pretrial deadlines at this time. The pa rties may renew their motion for a trial date and for entry of pretrial deadlines after the Court rules on Speedway's motion for summary judgment. The Court DENIES the request for a telephonic status conference to set a trial date. The Court DENIES Hopkins's motion to amend the scheduling order (DN 22 ). cc: Counsel (CDR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.