Brown Jordan International, Inc. et al v. Carmicle et al
| Brown Jordan International, Inc., BJI Holdings, LLC, Brown Jordan Services, Inc., Brown Jordan Company and Christopher Carmicle |
| Christopher Carmicle and BJI Holdings, LLC |
| Rashna Carmicle |
| 3:2015mc00027 |
| October 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 10/19/2015. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Expedited Motion to Compel (DN [1)] is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Rashna Carmicle shall produce her iPhone to OneSource Discovery, 4322 Robards Lane, Louisville, Kentucky, no later than 4 p.m. ET on Wednesday, October 21, 2015, for a forensic examination in accordance with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida's Order Setting Computer Forensic In vestigation Protocol, and that she shall complete her review of the documents collected from her iPhone by 12 p.m. ET on Friday, October 30, 2015, in all other respects in accordance with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida's Order Setting Computer Forensic Investigation Protocol. cc: Counsel of record; Daniel Blonsky, Esq. and Susan E. Raffanello, Esq. (CDR) Modified distribution on 10/19/2015 (CDR).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
