Guarnieri v. Garyantes
Plaintiff: Gino R. Guarnieri
Defendant: Michael E. Garyantes
Case Number: 3:2016cv00080
Filed: February 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Henry
Presiding Judge: David J. Hale
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 9/13/2017; Garyantess motion for summary judgment (D.N. 10) is GRANTED. A separate judgment will be entered this date. Garyantess supplemental motion for summary judgment (D.N. 18) is DENIED as moot. cc:counsel (ARM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guarnieri v. Garyantes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gino R. Guarnieri
Represented By: Donald R. Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael E. Garyantes
Represented By: Perry R. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?