Booker v. Gates Rubber Company
Plaintiff: Carlos Booker
Defendant: Gates Rubber Company
Case Number: 3:2016cv00097
Filed: February 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Hardin
Presiding Judge: Greg N. Stivers
Presiding Judge: Dave Whalin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 11/7/2016 re 13 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DN 13 ) is GRANTED. cc: Counsel (CDR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Booker v. Gates Rubber Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Booker
Represented By: James A. Maples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gates Rubber Company
Represented By: Dean T. Howell
Represented By: Howard E. Jarvis
Represented By: Robert Kum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?