Branham v. Bolton et al
| Bryan Anthony Branham |
| Mark Bolton, Martha Knox and Joe Blue |
| 3:2016cv00108 |
| February 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| David J. Hale |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale. Because time for Plaintiff to file amended complaint has passed, Court will dismiss action by separate Order. cc: plaintiff pro se, Jefferson Cty Atty, Bullitt Cty Atty, Hopkins Cty Atty (JAC)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale. Plaintiff's official-capacity claims against all Defendants are dismissed. Plaintiff's claims based upon his safety concerns and required purchase of hygiene products at BC DC and his claims based upon the theft of his clothing and inadequate legal resources at HCDC are also dismissed. Within 30 days, Plaintiff to file amended complaint and completed summons forms as set forth.cc: plaintiff pro se, Jefferson Cty Atty, Bullitt Cty Atty, Hardin Cty Atty (JAC)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale stating that because Plaintiff has failed to file a notice of change of address, the Court concludes that he has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this case, and the Court will dismiss the action by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (RR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
