Williams et al v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
| Jeremy Wayne Williams, Charles L. Wooten and Stephen Todd Hines |
| Hardin County Detention Center, H.C.D.C. Medical Staff, Southern Health Partners, Danny Allen, Lisa Curry and Lisa |
| 3:2016cv00186 |
| March 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Hardin |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 3/29/2019. Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental response (DN 95 ), which is GRANTED, and a supplemental response to the motions for summary judgm ent (DN 98 ). For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment by the SHP Defendants (DN 67 ) and by the County Defendants (DN 68 ) are GRANTED. The Court having determined that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (DN 56 ) is DENIED. The Court will enter a separate Judgment dismissing the case. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 1/24/2017; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 1983 official-capacity claims against Defendants Curry, Lisa, and Allen and his 1983 individual-capacity claim against Defendant Allen are D ISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court will enter a separate Order Directing Service and Scheduling Order governing the claims that have been permitted to proceed. cc: Counsel; Defendants; Hardin County Attorney (CDR)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/19/2016; Within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with respect to his claims of denied medical an d mental health treatment. Clerk of Court DIRECTED to place case number and word "Amended" on a § 1983 complaint form and send it, along with three summons forms, to Plaintiff for his use should he wish to amend the complaint. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Hardin County Attorney (CDR)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers; IT IS ORDERED that the claims by Plaintiffs Wooten and Hines are DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Plaintiffs Wooten and Hines as parties to this action. The prior Memorandum and Order (DN 6) obligating Plaintiffs Wooten and Hines each to pay a one-third portion of the filing fee ($133.33) in this action remains in full effect. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Hardin Count y Detention Center shall collect and forward the $133.33 filing fee from each of Plaintiffs Wooten's and Hines's inmate accounts to the Clerk for payment of their portions of the fee. cc: Plaintiffs, pro se; Finance; Hardin County Detention Center (ERH)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Charles L. Wooten and Stephen Todd Hines shall tender a one-third portion of the $400.00 filing fee ($133.33) or each file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees along with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six months immediately preceding the filing of this action within 30 days from entry of this Order. cc: Plaintiffs, pro se (ERH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
