Belden v. Jordan et al
| John Belden |
| Scott Jordan, Ryan Ramey, Responding Officers, Jeff Engrim, Responsible Health Care Staff, Jesse A. Catlett and Preston Morrow |
| 3:2016cv00511 |
| August 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Oldham |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/8/18; granting 38 Motion for Summary Judgment: Defendant Ryan Ramey's Motion for Summary Judgment, DN 38 , is GRANTED. Also, Plaintiff John Belden has until Friday, 3 /30/2018 to file a brief addressing whether summary judgment in the unidentified responding officers favor is appropriate and showing good cause for his failure to serve the defendants listed as unidentified officers. cc: Counsel, John Belden (pro se) (DJT)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/14/17; denying 37 Motion for Ruling ; granting 26 Motion for Order Compelling Discovery and Subpoena for Deposition: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel (DN [ 26]) Defendant Ramey to produce the documents and videos sought in his First Request for Production of Discovery is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that his motion for issuance of subpoena (DN 26 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's requ est for an extension (DN 26 ) is GRANTED. The Court will extend all deadlines by separate Order. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel (DN 26 ) is DENIED. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for ruling (DN 37 ) regarding the discovery matters is DENIED as moot. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/11/2017;, Preston Morrow, Jesse A. Catlett and Scott Jordan terminated. Separate order regarding service and scheduling shall enter.cc:counsel, plaintiff pro se (KJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
