Cleveland et al v. Louisville Metro Government et al
| Danielle Cleveland and Dominique Wicker |
| Louisville Metro Government, Taylor Banks, Beau Gadegaard, Brian Smith, Malcolm Miller, Steve Conrad and Unknown Officers |
| 3:2016cv00588 |
| September 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/6/2019 - The Court will grant the motions for summary judgment as to the Fourteenth Amendment § 1983 claim, the negligence claim, and the municipal liability claim. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. Please see Memorandum Opinion for further details. cc: Counsel (KD)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/20/2017, re Defendants Brian Smith, Beau Gadegaard, and Taylor Banks' 32 Partial MOTION to Dismiss, and 33 MOTION for More Definite Statement. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/23/2017. Plaintiffs' 22 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. Claims against Miller are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendants Taylor Banks, Beau Gadegaard, and Brian Smith's 15 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel(RLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
