Balcar v. Smith et al
Yale Larry Balcar |
Aaron Smith, Rodney Ballard and Correct Care Services |
3:2016cv00599 |
September 12, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Oldham |
Thomas B. Russell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 10/19/2018: Because both Plaintiffs have failed to comply with a straightforward Order of this Court, despite being warned that dismissal would occur without compliance, the Court concludes that they have abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. Therefore, the Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. cc: counsel, Plaintiffs (pro se), Defendants (JM) |
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 12/11/2017 denying 9 Motion for Preliminary Review of the Complaint; denying as moot 13 Motion for Transportation by U.S. Marshal Only; denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 20 Motion for Entry of Default; and denying as premature 28 Motion for OSHA Inspection. cc: Plaintiffs, pro se; Defendants; Counsel of Record; General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Office of Legal Counsel(MNM) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell granting Plaintiffs' motion for extension of time (DN 18 ) and denying Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction (DN 8 ). cc: Counsel, plaintiffs pro se(JAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.