Commins v. NES Rentals Holdings, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Samantha D. (Rowell) Commins
Defendant: NES Rentals Holdings, Inc., NES Equipment Services Corporation and Genie Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2016cv00608
Filed: September 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Greg N. Stivers
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 343 Jury Instructions. (JM)
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 210 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 3/11/2020. All parties' motions to exceed page limits DN 159 , 166 , 182 are GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Seal DN 183 is GRANTED, and DN 184 shall be sealed. D efendant's Motion for Summary Judgment DN 164 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's product liability claims based on manufacturing and failure-to-warn defects are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's product liabili ty claims based on design defects SURVIVE. All parties' motions to exclude each other's expert witnesses DN 157 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 169 , and Defendant's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment DN 167 are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply DN 197 is DENIED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Dave Whalin on 6/28/2018. granting in part and denying in part 84 Motion to Compel. Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/10/2018 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Dave Whalin. cc: Counsel(KJA)
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 8/14/2017 denying 19 Defendants' Joint Motion to Transfer for Improper Venue. cc: Counsel (CDR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Commins v. NES Rentals Holdings, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha D. (Rowell) Commins
Represented By: Vineet Bhatia
Represented By: Cory Buland
Represented By: Shawn L. Raymond
Represented By: Andrew Sher
Represented By: Tyler S. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NES Rentals Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: D. Craig York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NES Equipment Services Corporation
Represented By: D. Craig York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Genie Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher R. Cashen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?