United Parcel Service Co. et al v. DNJ Logistic Group, Inc. et al
| United Parcel Service Co. and UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. |
| DNJ Logistic Group, Inc. and Ralph Nabavi |
| 3:2016cv00609 |
| September 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/18/2019. Finding that UPS has sufficiently proved its damages "with reasonable certainty," IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs are awarded damages in the amount of $ ;7,778,676 plus prejudgment interest at the Kentucky statutory rate of 6% and postjudgment interest at a rate of 1.81% pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961. Costs shall be awarded to UPS upon the submission of a bill of costs to the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1920. cc: Counsel; DNJ Logistics Group, Inc.; Ralph Nabavi (CDF)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/3/2018: Defendant's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's 4/16/2018, Discovery Order (DN 57 ) is OVERRULED. cc: counsel (JM)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/19/2017 granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' breach of contract claims and Worldwide Forwarding's unjust enrichment claim remain; the negligent misrepresentation claims are dismissed. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
