Carr v. Buckley et al
| Thomas Jewell Carr |
| Officer Buckley, Thomas B. Wine, Courtney Straw, Judge Haynes, Louisville-Jefferson County Public Defender Corp. and City of Louisville/State of Kentucky |
| 3:2016cv00748 |
| November 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| David J. Hale |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale. The Court concludes that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action, and that dismissal is warranted. Separate order to be entered. cc:counsel, plaintiff pro se, Def Buckley (JAC)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale. Certain of Plaintiff's claims dismissed as set forth. Clerk to terminate Defendants Haynes, Wine, Straw, Louisville-Jefferson County Public Defender Corp., and Commonwealth of Kentucky from docket of this action. Clerk to change name of Defendant City of Louisville to Louisville Metro Government. Certain of Plaintiff's claims to proceed as set forth. Action is stayed pending final disposition of criminal case against Plaintiff. Plaintiff to notify Court of final disposition of state criminal action as set forth. cc:counsel, plaintiff pro se, Jefferson County Attorney (JAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
