Jackson v. Jernigan et al
| James A. Jackson |
| Julie Scott Jernigan, James Crawford, Lescal Joe Taylor, Thomas Lawson, Louisville Metro Police Department, City of Louisville, Kentucky, Grant County, Kentucky and Commonwealth of Kentucky |
| 3:2016cv00750 |
| November 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 5/30/18; granting 98 Motion for Summary Judgment: The cross-motion for summary judgment and motion in limine by Plaintiff James A. Jackson (DN 102 ) are DENIED. cc: Counsel(DJT)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 5/11/2017: Plaintiff Jackson's motion to amend the complaint 57 is DENIED; the motion to dismiss by Defendants Jernigan, Taylor, and Grant County 34 is GRANTED ; the motion to dismiss by Defendants Crawford and the Commonwealth of Kentucky 25 and 26 is GRANTED; the motion to dismiss by Defendants Lawson, LMPD, and Louisville Metro 23 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and the motion for a hearing by Defendants Jernigan, Taylor, and Grant County 62 is DENIED. cc: Counsel (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
