Guldenschuh v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: |
Charles P. Guldenschuh |
Defendant: |
John Doe and Jane Doe |
Case Number: |
3:2017cv00005 |
Filed: |
January 3, 2017 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Office: |
Louisville Office |
County: |
Jefferson |
Presiding Judge: |
David J. Hale |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 12, 2018 |
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 7/11/2018 - The Court finds that Plaintiff's failure to comply with a straightforward order shows that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. Therefore, this action will be dismissed by separate Order.cc: Counsel, Plaintiff-pro se, Jefferson County Attorney (DAK)
|
May 22, 2017 |
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 5/19/2017 - All claims against Defendant Mark Bolton are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Mark Bolton as a party to this action. cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendants, Jefferson County Attorney (DAK)
|
April 7, 2017 |
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 4/6/2017 - Plaintiff's official-capacity claims are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate John Doe, LMDC Warden. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with information wit hin 30 days. Should Plaintiff fail to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a § 1983 complaint form. Amended Complaint due by 5/6/2017.cc: Plaintiff-pro se (with enclosures) (DAK)
|
February 6, 2017 |
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 2/5/2017; for the reasons stated forth in this opinion, Because removal is not authorized, the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain Petitioners criminal cases. By separate Order, the Court, therefore, will dismiss this action. Upon consideration, the Court concludes that the instant matters must be remanded to Jefferson Circuit Court.cc:Plaintiff, Dfts., Clerk Jefferson Circuit Court. (ARM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?