Guldenschuh v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Charles P. Guldenschuh
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Doe
Case Number: 3:2017cv00005
Filed: January 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: David J. Hale
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 7/11/2018 - The Court finds that Plaintiff's failure to comply with a straightforward order shows that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecuting this action. Therefore, this action will be dismissed by separate Order.cc: Counsel, Plaintiff-pro se, Jefferson County Attorney (DAK)
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 5/19/2017 - All claims against Defendant Mark Bolton are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Mark Bolton as a party to this action. cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendants, Jefferson County Attorney (DAK)
April 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 4/6/2017 - Plaintiff's official-capacity claims are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate John Doe, LMDC Warden. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with information wit hin 30 days. Should Plaintiff fail to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a § 1983 complaint form. Amended Complaint due by 5/6/2017.cc: Plaintiff-pro se (with enclosures) (DAK)
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 2/5/2017; for the reasons stated forth in this opinion, Because removal is not authorized, the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain Petitioners criminal cases. By separate Order, the Court, therefore, will dismiss this action. Upon consideration, the Court concludes that the instant matters must be remanded to Jefferson Circuit Court.cc:Plaintiff, Dfts., Clerk Jefferson Circuit Court. (ARM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guldenschuh v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles P. Guldenschuh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?