Simpson v. Xerox Education Services LLC
| Rose M Simpson |
| Xerox Education Services LLC |
| 3:2017cv00076 |
| February 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 1/3/2023. Defendants' Bill of Costs (DE 114 ) is GRANTED. Simpson's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (DE 115 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Simpson SHALL pay Defendants their costs in the amount of $1,933.44. Payment to Defendants shall be forwarded to counsel of record within thirty days of the entry of this Order. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff-pro se (SMJ)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 3/24/2022. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment related to Plaintiff's FDCPA claim (DE 100 ) is GRANTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment related to Plaintiff's FCRA claim (DE 100 ) is GRANTED. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff-pro se (SMJ)
|
|
Filing
93
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 10/22/2020 re 84 Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth above and in the Court's prior Memorandum Opinion and Order (DN 84 ), as mod ified herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Simpson's Motion to Amend Complaint & Request for Additional Assistance (DNs 63 , 71 ) is DENIED.The stay of Simpson's deadline to file objections is LIFTED. Simpson shall file any objections to the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order (DN 84) and the instant Supplemental Opinion and Order as prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Within fourteen days of entry of this Order, the Parties shall jointly contact the undersigned's Case Manager to schedule a telephonic status conference to discuss resetting the deadlines previously held in abeyance and reschedule the settlement conference in this matter. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff-pro se (SMJ)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 3/3/20; granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting in part and denying in part 71 Motion to Amend/Correct: Simpson's request to amen d her Complaint is DENIED. Simpson's request for additional assistance regarding her errata sheet is GRANTED as to her attempt to correct the spelling of her husband's name on page fourteen, line seven of her deposition an d her attempt to correct her title on page twenty-seven, line nineteen of her deposition. Her request is DENIED as to her remaining attempted corrections. On or before 3/16/2020, Simpson shall prepare a new errata sheet containing only the t wo changes listed in Subsection (2) above, sign, and serve the same on Defendants to be attached to her deposition transcript. Simpson shall also serve a copy of the instant opinion and her new errata sheet on the court reporter who transcribed her d eposition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with the Court's 9/9/2019, Order (DN 80 ), within fourteen days of entry of this Order, the Parties shall jointly contact the undersigned's Case Manager, Theresa Burch, via e-mail, at theresa_burch@kywd.uscourts.gov, to schedule a telephonic status conference to discuss resetting the deadlines previously held in abeyance and rescheduling the settlement conference in this matter. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se)(DJT)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 12/18/2017: The motion to dismiss by defendant CES 23 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; The motion to add Conduent Inc. as a defendant by plaintiff Simpson 22 is GRANTED; and The motion to enforce restitution by plaintiff Simpson 26 is DENIED. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JM)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 10/6/2017: Plaintiff Rose M. Simpson's motions for default judgment 11 and 15 are DENIED; Defendant Conduent Education Service, LLC's motion to dismiss [13 ] is DENIED AS MOOT as to Conduent, Inc.; Defendant Conduent Education Service, LLC's motion to dismiss 13 is GRANTED as to defendant Conduent Education Services, LLC f/k/a Xerox Education Services, LLC, d/b/a/ ACS Education Services, LLC; If plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint, she must file an amended complaint within 30 days of the entry of this order. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simpson v. Xerox Education Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rose M Simpson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Xerox Education Services LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
