Balcar et al v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Yale L. Balcar and Clarence Russell
Defendant: Aaron Smith, Williams and Rodney Ballard
Case Number: 3:2017cv00119
Filed: February 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/22/2018. Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiffs' failure to exhaust administrative remedies (DN 23 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiffs' first cross-motion for summary judgment (DN 31 ) is DENIED. Plaintiffs' remaining state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to STRIKE Plaintiffs' second cross-motion for summary judgment (DN 34 ) from the docket because it is a duplicate of Plaintiff's first cross-motion for summary judgment. cc: counsel; Plaintiff, pro se (KD)
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 10/27/2017. Court construes Defendants' renewed 23 MOTION to Dismiss as a Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court will permit Plaintiffs to file a second response to Defendants' motion within thirty (30) days of entry of this Order. Defendants may file a reply fourteen (14) days from service of Plaintiffs' response. cc: Plaintiffs, pro se; Counsel (RLK)
May 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 5/4/2017. Plaintiffs' 42 USC 1983 official-capacity claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs' claim for injunctive relief is DISMISSED. cc: Plaintiffs, pro se; Defendants (RLK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Balcar et al v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yale L. Balcar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarence Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodney Ballard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?