In Re: Matter of the Complaint of JWN Consulting, LLC and Jefferson Neal
Petitioner: In Re: Matter of the Complaint of JWN Consulting, LLC and Jefferson Neal
Case Number: 3:2017cv00120
Filed: February 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: David J. Hale
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 3/26/2018. Shaws motion to dismiss (D.N. 22 ) is GRANTED. This matter is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h) (3) and STRICKEN from the Courts docket. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. cc:counsel (MEJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Matter of the Complaint of JWN Consulting, LLC and Jefferson Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In Re: Matter of the Complaint of JWN Consulting, LLC and Jefferson Neal
Represented By: John P. Fleming
Represented By: Ashley S. Lant
Represented By: James K. Mondl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?