Martinez v. Bolton et al
| Mauricio Martinez |
| Mark Bolton, Nicholus Espinoza and LMDC Security |
| 3:2017cv00265 |
| April 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| David J. Hale |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 11/30/2017 - The 90-day period for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired. The Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action.cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendant Bolton, Jefferson County Attorney (DAK)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 7/13/2017. The claims against Defendants Mark Bolton and Nicholas Espinoza are DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate these individuals as parties to this action. Plainti ff shall have 90 days in which to move to amend his complaint or show cause for his failure to do so. Plaintiff should complete a separate summons for each newly named Defendant within this same time period. Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Pla intiff a blank 1983 form and four summons forms with the words "second amended" and this case number written upon them, and also to send Plaintiff a Pro Se Prisoner Handbook. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendant Bolton; Jefferson County Attorney (CDR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
