Violett v. Dowden et al
Plaintiff: Donald R. Violett
Defendant: Casey Dowden, John Hall, Teresa Turner and Anna Valentine
Case Number: 3:2017cv00531
Filed: August 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Oldham
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 158 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 3/16/2020. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (DN 102 ) is REINSTATED to the Court's active docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for summary judgme nt by the KDOC Defendants (DNs 102 and 135 ) and by Defendant Domalewski (DN 136 ) are GRANTED. The Court having determined that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment, IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (DN 140 ) is DENIED. The Court will enter a separate Judgment dismissing the case. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (CDF)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/26/2019: denying 116 Motion to Depose; denying as moot 117 Motion for Additional Discovery; granting 125 Motion to to Dismiss Defendants John Hall and Teresa Turner. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Hall and Turner. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JM)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 3/18/2019. This matter is before the Court on numerous pending motions. [DN 45 ; DN 53 ; DN 57 ; DN 63 ; DN 64 ; DN 65 ; DN 68 ; DN 71 ; DN 72 ; DN 74 ; DN 76 ; D N 80 ; DN 82 ; DN 83 ; DN 89 ; DN 91 ; DN 98 ]. This Order addresses all pending motions of the parties, except for Defendant Domalewski's Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution And/Or Summary Judgment. 69 . Parties shall comply as set forth in Order. cc: Counsel, Pro Se Plaintiff (MEJ)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 8/3/2018. Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief (DNs 28 , 38 , and 40 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant Domalewski's response (DN 51 ) is DENIED. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for details. cc: Counsel, Pro Se Plaintiff (MEJ)
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/26/2018. The Court will enter a separate Order Regarding Service and Scheduling Order to govern the development of the proceeding claims.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of Record; Defendants Turner, Domalewski, Lefebvre, and Royalty (MNM)
December 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 12/13/17; denying 8 Motion to Submit Exhibits. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT)
November 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/28/17; granting 7 Motion to Amend/Correct granting 11 Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Additional Defendants: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add LPN Domalewski as a Defendant to the docket of this case. Within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as to the following claims: The claim brought under Title II of the ADA; The retaliation claim re garding being placed in the Restricted Housing Unit; and the Eighth Amendment claim regarding Plaintiff slipping and falling because he was denied the use of his walker and assistance. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place the instant case number and the word Amended on a § 1983 complaint form and send it, along with two summons forms, to Plaintiff for his completion. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Defendants, General Counsel (DJT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Violett v. Dowden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald R. Violett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Casey Dowden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teresa Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anna Valentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?