Cimiotta v. Slaubaugh

Cimiotta v. Slaubaugh

Plaintiff:	Kenneth Dean Cimiotta
Defendant:	Ryan Slaubaugh
Case Number:	3:2017cv00594
Filed:	September 27, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Louisville Office
County:	Hardin
Presiding Judge:	David J. Hale
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 26, 2019	Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERm by Judge David J. Hale on 9/26/2019. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (DN 34) is GRANTED. The Court will dismiss this action by separate Judgment. cc: Counsel, Pro Se Plaintiff (MEJ)
January 29, 2018	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 1/26/2018. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs official-capacity claims against Defendant Slaubaugh are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &# 167; 1915A(b)(1). A separate Scheduling Order will be entered to govern the development of Plaintiffs continuing claims. In allowing those claims to go forward, the Court offers no opinion on theirultimate merit.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendant; Elizabethtown City Attorney (MNM)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 26, 2019

Filing 45 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERm by Judge David J. Hale on 9/26/2019. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (DN 34) is GRANTED. The Court will dismiss this action by separate Judgment. cc: Counsel, Pro Se Plaintiff (MEJ)

January 29, 2018

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 1/26/2018. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs official-capacity claims against Defendant Slaubaugh are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &# 167; 1915A(b)(1). A separate Scheduling Order will be entered to govern the development of Plaintiffs continuing claims. In allowing those claims to go forward, the Court offers no opinion on theirultimate merit.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendant; Elizabethtown City Attorney (MNM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cimiotta v. Slaubaugh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Dean Cimiotta
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Slaubaugh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?