Phoenix v. McCarthy et al
| Gail Marie Phoenix |
| Ryan D. McCarthy, Human Resources Command, Jon Andrew Banco, Aubrey Ray Henley, Jeffrey K. Bryson, David Charles Martino, Oscar Garcia, Anthony Bernard Clark, Sidney C. Zemp and James C. McConville |
| 3:2017cv00598 |
| September 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Hardin |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 a-3 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/7/2023. Defendant's Motion for Costs (DE 119 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Gail M. Phoenix SHALL pay Defendant its costs to the amount of $3,678.20. Payment to Defendant shall be forwarded to counsel of record within thirty days of the entry of this Order. Defendant's objection (DE 124 ) is SUSTAINED. Phoenix's Transcript of Evidence (DE 121 ) is STRICKEN from the record. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff-pro se (SMJ)
|
|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 2/9/2023. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 91 ) is GRANTED. The Court DENIES Phoenix's Motion to Set a Hearing Date (DE 112 ). cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (SMJ) Modified on 2/10/2023 - date corrected (SMJ).
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/6/2020. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 70 ) is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply (DN 84 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (DN 71 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (Review Order for specifics.) cc: Plaintiff, pro se (via CM/ECF per DN 39 ); Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 11/14/2019. For the reasons set forth, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 33 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (DN 56 ) are DENIED. Defend ant's Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All of Phoenix's claims based on acts occurring prior to June 18, 2016; her retaliation claim based on the lowering of her performance evaluation on December 11, 2017; and her retaliation claim based on the questioning of her security clearance are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All other claims remain pending. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (via electronic noticing - per DN 39 ); Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 1/31/2019 re 9 Motion to Dismiss. The claims against all Defendants except for Dr. Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army, are DISMISSED pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (DN 9 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The case will proceed on Plaintiff's retaliation claim. All other claims are DISMISSED. cc: Gail Marie Phoenix, pro se; Counsel; Defendants (CDF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
