Barrios v. Elmore et al

Plaintiff:	Francis Barrios
Defendant:	Caleb Elmore, Reza Rashidian and Dayna Elmore
Case Number:	3:2018cv00132
Filed:	March 5, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Louisville Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	David J. Hale
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 16, 2022	Filing 156 Jury Instructions. (SRH)
July 29, 2020	Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 7/29/2020 - Barrios's motion for leave to file a response (D.N. 87 ) is GRANTED. The Response (D.N. 84 ) is deemed timely filed. Elmore's motion to strike the response (D.N. 85 ) is DENIED as moot. Elmore's Objection (D.N. 79 ) to Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards's Order (D.N. 78 ) is OVERRULED. (KD)
January 2, 2020	Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 1/2/2020 - Caleb Elmore's motion for summary judgment (D.N. 49 ) is DENIED. (KD)
July 31, 2018	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 7/30/2018. Defendant Caleb Elmore's motion to consolidate (D.N. 4 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants' motion to dismiss (D.N. 6 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Barrios's abuse-of-process (Counts V and VI) and defamation (Counts IV and VII) claims are DISMISSED. Barrios's remaining claims against Caleb Elmore (Counts I, II, and III) may proceed. P ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) ( 1)(A), this matter is REFERRED to U.S. Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Parties shall comply as set forth in Order. cc: Counsel (MEJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barrios v. Elmore et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francis Barrios
Represented By:	Glenn A. Cohen
Represented By:	Lynn M. Watson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Caleb Elmore
Represented By:	Joshua Adam Engel
Represented By:	Jeffrey C. Shipp
Represented By:	Anne L. Tamashasky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Reza Rashidian
Represented By:	Joshua Adam Engel
Represented By:	Jeffrey C. Shipp
Represented By:	Anne L. Tamashasky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dayna Elmore
Represented By:	Joshua Adam Engel
Represented By:	Jeffrey C. Shipp
Represented By:	Anne L. Tamashasky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?