Blackman v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
Jovan Blackman |
Hardin County Detention Center and Elmore |
3:2018cv00159 |
March 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Jefferson |
David J. Hale |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM by Judge David J. Hale on 5/31/2019 - Plaintiff has not advised the Court of his new address, and neither notices from this Court nor filings by Defendants in this action can be served on Plaintiff. Because it appears to this Court that Plaintiff has abandoned any interest in prosecution of this case, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of Record (KD) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 7/23/2018 - The claims against Defendant HCDC and Defendant Elmore in his official capacity are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The individual-capacity claim regarding Defendant Elmore's use of racial slurs is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate HCDC as a Defendant in this action. A separate Order Directing Service and Scheduling Order will be entered to govern the development of the continuing claims. cc: Plaintiff, Defendants, and Hardin County Attorney (KD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.