Cornelius v. City of Mount Washington, Kentucky et al
| Robert Cornelius |
| City of Mount Washington, Kentucky, Jessie Bratcher, Mike Stump, Tim Morris and Roy Daugherty |
| 3:2018cv00341 |
| May 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Bullitt |
| David J. Hale |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/21/2021. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 66 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim, and state law outrage, negli gence, and abuse of process claims against Defendants Jessie Bratcher and Mike Stump are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim and state law battery claim may continue. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 67 ) is GRANTED. All claims against Defendants City of Mount Washington, Kentucky, Tim Morris, and Roy Daugherty are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 68 ) is DENIED. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 10/30/2020 granting 40 Motion to Dismiss filed by Trevor Ford. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Trevor Ford are DISMISSED. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
