Loman v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC et al
William Loman |
Trans Union, LLC, Louisville Recovery Service, LLC and Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC |
3:2018cv00591 |
September 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Lanny King |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 10/17/2018: Loman's claims against Enhanced Recovery Company are DISMISSED without prejudice. The parties shall tender an agreed order of dismissal with prejudice within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Order. The Court will entertain a motion to reinstate Loman's claims against Enhanced Recovery Company within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Order in the event the settlement is not consummated. This Order does affect Loman's claims against any other Defendant in this matter. cc: counsel (JM) |
Filing 12 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 10/17/2018: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/2018 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Lanny King. No later than twenty-one (21) days before the Rule 16 conference, counsel forthe parties shall conduct the conference of parties required by Rule 26(f). Within fourteen (14) days after the Rule 26(f) conference of parties, counsel forthe parties shall file a written joint report. cc: counsel (JM) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendant Enhanced Recovery Co., LLC by William Loman (Lawson, James) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, And Affirmative Defenses by Trans Union, LLC. (Brown, William) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Louisville Recovery Service, LLC. (Deatrick, David) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Louisville Recovery Service, LLC. (Deatrick, David) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David Ross Deatrick, Jr on behalf of Louisville Recovery Service, LLC (Deatrick, David) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Trans Union, LLC. by Trans Union, LLC. (Brown, William) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Robert Brown on behalf of Trans Union, LLC (Brown, William) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 9/6/2018; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Lanny King, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge King is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (NWT) |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, Louisville Recovery Service, LLC, Trans Union, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued Summonses. (VS) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. Magistrate Judge designation: Magistrate Judge Lanny King. (VS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, Louisville Recovery Service, LLC and Trans Union, LLC, filed by William Loman. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0644-2709780). (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (VS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.