United States of America v. Maddox et al
United States of America |
Tina's Tax Service, LLC and Christina Maddox |
3:2018cv00594 |
September 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Taxes |
26 U.S.C. § 7407 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING re #6 Answer by Christina Maddox. (Notice states that the answer in this action was prepared with the assistance of counsel.) (JM) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Defendant Christina Maddox. (JM) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Christina Maddox. (JM) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Tina's Tax Service, LLC served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. (Miller, Matthew) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Christina Maddox served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. (Miller, Matthew) |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Christina Maddox, Tina's Tax Service, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued Summonses. (VS) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. Magistrate Judge designation: Judge Lanny King. (VS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF against Christina Maddox, Tina's Tax Service, LLC, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered). (VS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.