Hicks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
Keith Hicks, Jr. |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Adam Sparks Insurance Agency |
3:2018cv00770 |
November 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Regina S Edwards |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Klapheke, David) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Adam Sparks Insurance Agency. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Banks, Darrin) |
Filing 10 Agreed REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Klapheke, David) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Keith Hicks, Jr (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Natale, Christina) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Keith Hicks, Jr (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Natale, Christina) |
Filing 7 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 11/28/2018. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 1/30/2019 at 1:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. The Court will initiate the call to counsel. Parties shall comply as set forth in Order. cc: Counsel (MEJ) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Adam Sparks Insurance Agency (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Banks, Darrin) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 11/27/2018. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court REFERS this case to United States Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards for purposes of: 1) resolving all non-dispositive pretrial motions; 2) generally managing discovery, including resolving all discovery disputes and conducting any hearing(s) other than the pretrial conference; 3) generally managing all pretrial scheduling issues, including altering any dates and/or deadlines, except deadlines for dispositive/Daubert motions, and the pretrial conference and the trial deadlines; 4) conducting a mid-discovery telephonic conference; and 5) conducting a settlement conference, if requested by the parties. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (RLK) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Adam Sparks Insurance Agency. (Filed in Jefferson Circuit Court on 10/28/2018. See #1 for PDF.) (RLK) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (DJT) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. Magistrate Judge designation: Regina S. Edwards. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [ANSWER FILED] by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-5402. Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-2755973, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Record) (DJT) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Filed in Jefferson Circuit Court on 10/16/2018. See #1 for PDF.) (DJT) Modified on 11/27/2018: added language as to when Answer was filed (RLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.