Marshall v. Erwin et al
Stephen Marshall |
Scott Jordan, Tim Forgy, Klayton Rodgers and Commissioner James Erwin |
3:2018cv00843 |
December 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Joseph H McKinley |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) Signed by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 1/7/2019 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: LLCC to collect filing fee from inmate account; Clerk to open account for receipt of payment. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Finance, LLCC- Inmate Accounts(JM) |
Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stephen Marshall. (DJT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen Marshall (DJT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Erwin, Tim Forgy, Scott Jordan, Klayton Rodgers, filed by Stephen Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachments and Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Incident Report Summary, #3 Exhibit Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Letter, #4 Exhibit Grievance Information Form, #5 Exhibit Commissioner's Review, #6 Exhibit Grievance Appeal Form, #7 Envelope, #8 Summons) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.