Sanchez v. The Kroger Co.
| Michelle Sanchez |
| The Kroger Co. |
| 3:2018cv00852 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Lanny King |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 fm |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Faith C. Whittaker on behalf of The Kroger Co. (Whittaker, Faith) |
Filing 9
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT by Magistrate Judge Lanny King (EBOC) on 1/29/2019. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/12/2019 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Lanny King. Counsel for the parties shall connect to the conference by dialing Toll Free Meeting Number 1-877-848-7030 and entering Access Code 7238577#. cc: Counsel (MEJ)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 1/28/2019; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Lanny King, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge King is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (NWT)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by The Kroger Co.. (Rogers, Vanessa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 1/8/2019. The time for the Defendant, The Kroger Company to file and serve their Answer to the Complaint of the Plaintiff, Michelle Sanchez, or Other Responsive Pleading, is hereby extended to and including 1/18/2019. cc: Counsel (MEJ)
|
| Filing 5 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation by The Kroger Co.. (Rogers, Vanessa) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL re #1 Notice of Removal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Civil Action Number 18-CI-7071. cc: Counsel; Jefferson Circuit Court (JWM) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Kroger Co.. (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Kroger Co. from Jefferson Circuit Court, Case Number 18-CI-007071. ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-2774746 ) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B-Cases, #3 Cover Sheet) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez v. The Kroger Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Kroger Co. | |
| Represented By: | Vanessa N. Rogers |
| Represented By: | Travers B. Manley |
| Represented By: | Faith C. Whittaker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Sanchez | |
| Represented By: | Brian G. Abell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
