Chapman v. First Financial Bank, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kathryn Chapman
Defendant: First Financial Bank, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00019
Filed: January 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Regina S Edwards
Referring Judge: Charles R Simpson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ON REPORT OF THE PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING AND REFERRAL ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 2/25/2019 - Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 3/15/2019. Discovery due by 8/23/2019. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 5/1/2019. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 7/1/2019. Plaintiff Joinder of Parties due by 4/1/2019. Joinder of Parties due by 4/15/2019. Plaintiff Amended Pleadings due by 4/1/2019. Defendant Amended Pleadings due by 4/15/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 9/27/2019. This matter is hereby REFERRED to Honorable Regina S. Edwards, United States Magistrate Judge, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and disposition of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Within thirty (30) days, counsel shall jointly contact case manager Ashley Henry at ashley_henry@kywd.uscourts.gov to schedule a telephonic status conference. cc: Counsel of Record (KD)
February 14, 2019 Filing 8 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by First Financial Bank, Inc.. (Nenni, David)
February 13, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Nenni on behalf of First Financial Bank, Inc. (Nenni, David)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING & REPORT (EBOC) by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/22/19: You must complete the enclosed Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting, and return it to the Court by 3/5/2019.cc:counsel (DJT)
January 14, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by First Financial Bank, Inc.. (Pryor, Patricia)
January 8, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Jefferson Circuit Court (MNM)
January 8, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent First Financial Bancorp. for First Financial Bank, Inc. (MNM)
January 8, 2019 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (MNM)
January 8, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by First Financial Bank, Inc. from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-007308 (filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2780531). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Bruner Declaration, #3 Cover Sheet) (MNM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapman v. First Financial Bank, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Chapman
Represented By: Randall S. Strause
Represented By: Parker M. Wornall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Financial Bank, Inc.
Represented By: Patricia M. Pryor
Represented By: David A. Nenni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?