Biamungu v. Davidson et al
Clarice Biamungu |
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Roger Davidson |
3:2019cv00045 |
January 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Regina S Edwards |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Amended REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Roger Davidson, Trinity Industries, Inc.. (Kaplan, David) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Roger Davidson, Trinity Industries, Inc.. (Kaplan, David) |
|
|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Roger Davidson, Trinity Industries, Inc.. (Aikin, Andrea) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Bullitt Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (KD) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate Trinity Logistics Group, Inc. for Trinity Industries, Inc. (KD) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (KD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Trinity Industries, Inc. and Roger Davidson from Bullitt Circuit Court, Case Number 18-CI-01245 (Filing fee $400.00, Receipt Number 0644-2786405), filed by Trinity Industries, Inc. and Roger Davidson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Service of Process from KY-SOS, #3 Cover Sheet). (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.