Helm v. Moon et al
| Vencente B Helm |
| Ofc. Johnson, Wellpath, Moon, Dir. Mark Bolton and Louisville Metro Department of Corrections |
| 3:2019cv00292 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| David J Hale |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 5/29/2019 - Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3) because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over them. There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final Order. This Court further certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would be frivolous and therefore would not be taken in good faith. cc: Plaintiff, Defendants, Jefferson County Attorney (KD)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 5/29/2019 - For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion, the Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff, Defendants, Jefferson County Attorney (KD) |
| Filing 8 Letter by Vencente B Helm. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Summons) (MEJ) |
| Filing 7 Summonses re Notice of Deficiency by Vencente B Helm re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope) (MEJ) |
| Response to #5 Notice of Deficiency filed by Vencente B Helm. (MEJ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale (EBOC) on 4/25/2019 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The LOUISVILLE METRO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $35.78 and shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. Said payment shall be clearly identified by Plaintiff's name, Inmate Identification Number, and number assigned to this action. Thereafter, LOUISVILLE METRO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $314.22 balance of the filing fee by collecting monthly payments from the prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account and forwarding payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). All payments shall be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court. cc: Counsel, Pro Se Plaintiff, Finance, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections. (MEJ)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Summonses do not include name and address for Defendants to mail Answers and Motions. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 5/20/2019. (RLJ) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (RLJ) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Vencente B Helm. (RLJ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Vencente B Helm. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit). (RLJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Bolton, Johnson, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Moon, and Wellpath, filed by Vencente B Helm. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Envelope). (RLJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
