Griffith v. Brown et al
Kayla Griffith |
Dana Brown, Omni Quality Assurance, LLC and Magna Seating of America, Inc. |
3:2019cv00298 |
April 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Regina S Edwards |
Greg N Stivers |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 mv |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendant Magna by Kayla Griffith. (Clay, Caroline) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER (EBOC) for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 6/3/2019. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 12/2/2019. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 2/3/2020. Amended Pleadings/Joinder of Parties due by 12/2/2019. Discovery due by 4/1/2020; Dispositive/Daubert Motions due by 5/1/2020. Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/9/2019 at 10:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. cc: counsel (JM) |
Filing 10 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kayla Griffith. (Clay, Caroline) |
Filing 9 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Dana Brown, Omni Quality Assurance, LLC. (Harville, Bradley) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Magna International, Inc. for Magna Seating of America, Inc.. by Magna Seating of America, Inc.. (Mayfield, Logan) |
Filing 7 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Dana Brown, Omni Quality Assurance, LLC. (Harville, Bradley) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 4/23/2019. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2019 at 10:30 AM ET before Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards. Counsel who will try the case shall attend. Parties shall conduct meeting required by Rule 26(f) by 5/13/2019 and file their Rule 26 Meeting Report by 5/27/2019. (Review Order in full for specifics, including conference agenda and report requirements.) cc: Counsel; AH (CDF) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 04/23/2019; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Regina S. Edwards, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Edwards is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel; AEH (TJD) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE to Counsel re #1 Notice of Removal from Bullitt Circuit Court, Civil Action Number 19-CI-276. cc: Counsel; Bullitt Circuit Court (JWM) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Omni Quality Assurance, LLC. (JWM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Omni Quality Assurance, LLC, Dana Brown from Bullitt Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-00276. ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-2849734 ) (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit B-State Court Process/Pleadings, #4 Exhibit C-State Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit D-Affidavit of Counsel) (JWM) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Magna Seating of America, Inc. (See DN #1 to view PDF) (JWM) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Dana Brown, Omni Quality Assurance, LLC. (See DN #1 to view PDF) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.