Davidson v. Louisville Metropolitan Government
Plaintiff: Nancy Ferrell Davidson
Defendant: Louisville Metropolitan Government
Case Number: 3:2019cv00309
Filed: April 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Claria Horn Boom
Referring Judge: Lanny King
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT /Agreed Proposed Litigation Plan by Louisville Metropolitan Government. (Rehmel, Tera)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 5/23/2019. Telephonic Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2019 at 11:00 AM (EST) before Magistrate Judge Lanny King. Counsel for the parties shall connect to the conference by dialing the toll-free number 1-877-848-7030 and entering access code 7238577#. cc: Counsel (KD)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 5/23/2019. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court REFERS this case to United States Magistrate Judge Lanny King for purposes of: 1) resolving all non-dispositive pretrial motions; 2) generally managing discovery, including resolving all discovery disputes and conducting any hearing(s) other than the pretrial conference; 3) generally managing all pretrial scheduling issues, including altering any dates and/or deadlines, except deadlines for dispositive/Daubert motions, and the pretrial conference and the trial deadlines; 4) conducting a mid-discovery telephonic conference; and 5) conducting a settlement conference, if requested by the parties. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (RLK)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Louisville Metropolitan Government. (Rehmel, Tera)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Louisville Metropolitan Government. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (MNM)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louisville Metropolitan Government, filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2852002, filed by Nancy Ferrell Davidson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davidson v. Louisville Metropolitan Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Ferrell Davidson
Represented By: Timothy Denison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisville Metropolitan Government
Represented By: Colleen O. Davis
Represented By: Tera M. Rehmel
Represented By: Patricia C. Le Meur
Represented By: Susan D. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?