Brown v. GLA Collection Co., Inc. et al
| Adrian Brown |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, GLA Collection Co., Inc., TransUnion, LLC and Central Kentucky Collections |
| 3:2019cv00376 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Pro Se (Non Prisoner) Registration to Receive Documents Electronically (Stephanie LaLonde on behalf of) by Central Kentucky Collections cc: QC (CDF) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to file a Redacted version of documents by Defendant Central Kentucky Collections. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope). cc: Counsel (RLJ) |
ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 6/17/2019 granting #13 Motion for Leave. (RLJ)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by TransUnion, LLC. (Jansen, Sandra) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 6/17/2019 re #9 Answer to Complaint filed by Central Kentucky Collections. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to RESTRICT electronic access to the document containing personal identifiers to Court users and participants in the case. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to send a copy of the document containing personal identifiers to Defendant Central Kentucky Collection, in care of, Stephanie LaLonde. Defendant shall file a motion seeking leave to file a redacted version of the document along with a copy of the redacted version within twenty-eight (28) days of entry of this Order. Once Defendant files a motion seeking leave to file a redacted version of the document, the motion will be GRANTED, and the Clerk will replace the document containing personal identifiers with the redacted version. cc: Counsel, Stephanie Lalonde (RLJ)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by GLA Collection Co., Inc.. (Smith, William) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Central Kentucky Collections. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). cc: Counsel (RLJ) (Main Document 9 replaced on 7/1/2019) (RLJ). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa R. Lamkin on behalf of GLA Collection Co., Inc. (Lamkin, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for TransUnion, LLC. by TransUnion, LLC. (Jansen, Sandra) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sandra D. Jansen on behalf of TransUnion, LLC (Jansen, Sandra) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GLA Collection Co., Inc.. (Smith, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by William E. Smith, III on behalf of GLA Collection Co., Inc. (Smith, William) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GLA Collection Co. Inc, Central Kentucky Collections, TransUnion, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (Attachments: #1 Summons Central Kentucky Collections, #2 Summons Trans Union, #3 Summons Equifax) (ALS) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (ALS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Central Kentucky Collections, Equifax Information Services, LLC, GLA Collection Co. Inc, TransUnion, LLC (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2871171) filed by Adrian Brown. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (ALS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
