Killebrew v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
Jason Lamont Killebrew |
Department of Mental Health, Department of Healthcare, Department of Justice, Court's Jurisdiction and Louisville Metro Department of Corrections |
3:2019cv00541 |
July 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable by Jason Lamont Killebrew re DN #4 . Envelope states Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, and Unable to Forward. (MEJ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint, #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Reason for Deficiency: Summons(es) and Prison Trust Fund Account Statement not tendered. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/28/2019. (AME) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jason Lamont Killebrew. (AME) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (AME) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Court's Jurisdiction, Department of Healthcare, Department of Justice, Department of Mental Health, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, filed by Jason Lamont Killebrew. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (AME) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.