Brown v. Well Path Medical Service
| Lavon Lee Brown |
| Well Path Medical Service, John Doe 3, John Doe 2, John Doe 4 and John Doe 1 |
| 3:2019cv00543 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, filed by Lavon Lee Brown. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (KD) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE - re: summons tendered for Wellpath by Lavon Lee Brown. (ALS) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/9/2019. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Well Path are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Well Path as a party to this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint in which he names as Defendants the individuals who are allegedly denying him access to medical care for his infected wounds and sues each Defendant in his/her individual capacity. Plaintiff should make specific allegations against each Defendant and describe how each is personally involved in the alleged violation of Plaintiffs rights. Plaintiff must also tender a summons form for each newly named Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the allotted 30-day period, the Court will enter an Order dismissing this action for the reasons stated herein. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place this case number and word Amended on a 1983 complaint form, along with four blank summons forms, and send them to Plaintiff for his use should he decide to file an amended complaint. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendant, Jefferson County Attorney (ALS)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE (EBOC) by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/31/2019. Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The LOUISVILLE METRO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350.00 filing fee by collecting monthly payments from Plaintiff's prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account and forwarding payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open an account for the payment of the filing fee in this action. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), USDC-WDKY Financial, Louisville Metro Department (ALS)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Summons tendered incomplete. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/29/2019. (ALS) |
| Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (ALS) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lavon Lee Brown. (ALS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lavon Lee Brown (ALS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Well Path Medical Service filed by Lavon Lee Brown. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (ALS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
