Chimney Safety Institute of America v. First Call Chimney Service, LLC et al
Chimney Safety Institute of America |
David York and First Call Chimney Service, LLC |
3:2019cv00705 |
October 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Charles R Simpson |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 5 MOTION for Arthur S. Garrett III to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 125; receipt number L33061893) by Plaintiff Chimney Safety Institute of America (Attachments: #1 Certificate, #2 Proposed Order) (ALS) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to First Call Chimney Service, LLC, David York. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (Attachments: #1 Summons York) (ALS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing or Determination re: Patent or Trademark re #1 Complaint, (ALS) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (ALS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Call Chimney Service, LLC, David York (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2955697) filed by Chimney Safety Institute of America. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit EX A - Registered US PTO, #3 Exhibit EX B - Registered CCS Service Mark, #4 Exhibit EX C - Def's Website displaying CCS Certification Mark, #6 Summons Tendered York, #7 Summons Tendered First Chimney) (ALS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.